My brother Bill and I spent some time discussing Popova’s
essay and the four points put forth in Russell’s speech. We noted that the
topics of the talk covered concepts explained in my own Gnostic studies, which
I will now share with you. Ah, if only we could have sat and conversed with
Russell face-to-face! Perhaps we shall do so someday in Paradise. In the
meanwhile, this article will cover Russell’s points and give you enough Gnostic
cosmology to understand my response.
In his acceptance speech, Russell claimed that desire
is the primary motivator of all human activity. He then outlined four specific
desires that cause people to behave the way they do: acquisitiveness,
rivalry, vanity, and love of power.
Regarding acquisitiveness, Russell concluded that, “However much you may acquire, you will always wish to acquire
more; satiety is a dream which will always elude you.” From my Gnostic
perspective, we can never be satisfied with what we have because no matter how
much we have it falls short of our riches in Paradise. In fact, this cosmos in
which we dwell is actually called “The Deficiency” by neo-Gnostics such as
myself. Let me explain.
According to the
Tripartite Tractate of the Nag Hammadi scriptures, we humans, as well as all
other lifeforms, were placed here on Earth to bring light and life to the
Deficiency. The Deficiency, which is to say our 3-dimensional time-bound,
material universe, came about as the result of a Fall from another dimension
called The Pleroma, or The Fullness. The Pleroma is the home of the first
created entities known as “aeons.”
In order to understand humanity, we
must first understand the aeons. In the very beginning, there was only consciousness,
known as the Creator, or “The Father.” Then consciousness had a thought, and
this thought created an offspring referred to as “The Son.” This Son contained
all of the attributes of the original consciousness, but in a limited form—the
way a bucket dipped in the ocean contains a sampling of the ocean. The moment
the Son arose from the Father, the Son had thoughts of its own. Each thought of
the Son was its own discreet slice of the Son, and the sum total of all of
these slices equaled the totality of the Son. These slices are the attributes
called “aeons.” Some aeons are personalities, some aeons are formulae, some
aeons are forces. Together, all of the aeons add up to the original Son, itself
a constrained form of the infinite Father.
Prior to the Fall, the aeons of the
Fullness sat in perfect equilibrium in their hierarchy of ranks, stations, and
names. As facets of a single entity, they were a
congress of one accord, meaning they agreed on everything and they cooperated
together while they dreamed a shared dream of Paradise.
Like the Son of which they were a
part, the aeons of the Fullness manifested wisdom, which is the ability to
reason with logic and prudence. The aeons also arose with a thirst to seek
after the originating consciousness of their Creator and a desire to remain aligned
with the Father’s Will. And finally, the aeons were all creative geniuses, able
to dream up a fully functioning mental Paradise where whatever they willed in
the Father’s name happened. In this manner, they designed a blueprint of our
universe.
In
their desire to give glory to the Father, that is, to remain aligned with the will
of their Creator, aeons of the Fullness followed these three, simple rules:
1. Give
glory to the Father, not to the Fullness. Aeons were to remain aligned with
the Son and not shift their focus to the Fullness as a whole.
2. Give
glory to the Father, not to individual aeons. Aeons were to remain always
mindful of the Father and not to give glory to themselves or their talented individual
neighbors.
3. Give
glory to the Father to the best of your own ability. An aeon was to give
glory from its own location in the hierarchy. They were not to sidle up next to
an aeon who appeared closer to the Father in order to borrow that aeon’s
station to give better glory. Rather, the individual was to develop its own
voice and talents.
The highest aeon in the hierarchy of the Fullness carried within
itself all of the attributes of all of the other aeons. It was a perfect,
fractal representation of the entire Fullness. According to the Tripartite
Tractate, this final aeon beheld its own glory and mistook itself for the
entire Fullness. This aeon then tragically launched itself out of the Fullness
in an attempt to reunite with the Father’s originating consciousness. As this
reunification was not possible, the aeon Fell and fractured into pieces. It is
these small pieces of the Fallen aeon that seeded our material Universe.
“Thus, the free will with which the
members of the ALL had been born caused this one to rush forward to give glory
to the Father” on its own. “And before he had yet produced anything
to the glory of the Will and in the union of the members of the ALL, he acted
presumptuously, out of an overflowing love, and rushed forward toward that
which surrounds the realm of perfect glory.” [The Tripartite Tractate, v. 76]
In modern terms, we could say that
the aeon fell from the imaginal realm into another dimension. Alone in that new
dimension, the talents, personalities, and algorithms of the aeon disintegrated
and formed the raw ingredients of our material universe.
The Fallen one imagined it could singlehandedly
build the Paradise dreamt by the Fullness because it understood all of the
plans and possessed all of the necessary talents. However, without the willing
support of the Fullness, its constructed Universe fell short of actualizing the
Paradisal blueprint.
“What issued from his presumptuous
thought and his arrogance had existed from something that itself was deficient;
because of that, what was perfect in him left him and went upward to his own”
in the Fullness, leaving the “sicknesses” behind in the darkness. [The
Tripartite Tractate, v. 78]
“From
the faltering and division came oblivion and ignorance of oneself and of that
which is.” [The Tripartite Tractate, v. 77] Presumptuous thought and
arrogance replaced wisdom.
No, we humans are not these blind, fallen phantoms that arose from
the broken body of the aeon. We are the offspring of the aeons who remained in
the Fullness, sent here to clean up the mess from the Fall. We “Second Order
Powers” were sent to Earth to overthrow what had come into existence from the
Fall. By sheer profusion of diversity, the cosmos came to be populated with
Second Order Powers who each remembered Paradise, the Fullnesses, and their
Creator.
Unfortunately, this material realm has the profound effect of
causing us Second Order Powers to forget our origins and our mission of
redemption. Instead, we find ourselves constantly doing battle with the
Deficiency on all levels--physical, spiritual, and emotional--and, due to the
Law of Mutual Combat, we have taken on many of the characteristics of the
Deficiency, forgetting all about the job we were sent here to do.
Now, back to Bertrand
Russell’s acceptance speech.
Regarding acquisitiveness: Because this material plane was created
as the result of the aeon’s Fall as it was reaching for the realm of perfect
glory, the bits and pieces that form our universe carry within their essence
the desire to reach upward for glory. Which is to say, they always want more.
And, because these bits and pieces originated within a perfect dream of
Paradise, whatever the phantoms build here on this fallen plane fails to
satisfy. Likewise, we Second Order Powers, trapped in this Endless War with the
Deficiency, have our own dim remembrance of Paradise that causes us to be
disappointed in the things we acquire here in this material realm.
Russell’s next human desire is rivalry, which is even stronger
than acquisitiveness. Rivalry, as Russell used it, is more than competition—it
is the desire to bring ruin upon one’s competitors. We can easily see this
desire to destroy the Other in the hateful politics gripping the world today.
Said Russell,
“The world would
be a happier place than it is if acquisitiveness were always stronger than
rivalry. But in fact, a great many men will cheerfully face impoverishment if
they can thereby secure complete ruin for their rivals.”
This drive to bring
ruin to others reflects, in Gnostic terms, the antithesis of love. Rather than
reflecting the abundance of love that first motivated the Fallen one to forget
its neighbors in the Fullness and rush upward to glory, the Fall produced
shadows of the traits of the Fullness and this aeon, so that the heavenly
virtues of the Fullness were inverted and only vices remained here below in the
shadows.
“Those
who came into being from the presumptuous thought resemble in fact the
Fullnesses of whom they are imitations, though they are phantoms, shadows, and
illusions, deprived of reason and light, belonging to this empty thought, being
nobody’s offspring.” [The Tripartite Tractate, v. 78]
Vanity is the next vice addressed by Russell. Popova points out in
her essay that our culture’s excessive social media narcissism is a newly
enhanced development of Russell’s observations about vanity. As Russell noted,
“Vanity is a
motive of immense potency. Anyone who has much to do with children knows how
they are constantly performing some antic, and saying “Look at me.” “Look at
me” is one of the most fundamental desires of the human heart. It can take
innumerable forms, from buffoonery to the pursuit of posthumous fame.”
This vanity, in Gnostic terms, arises from the “presumptuous
thought” that drove the aeon’s Fall in the first place. The Fallen one beheld
its own beauty and decided that itself was all that mattered. The shadows and
phantoms that arose from the aeon’s ashes thought they were the most beautiful
things.
“Those
who came into being from the presumptuous thought resemble in fact the
Fullnesses of whom they are imitations, though they are phantoms, shadows, and
illusions, deprived of reason and light, belonging to this empty thought, being
nobody’s offspring. . . In their own eyes, however, they are great and
powerful beings, more beautiful than the names [of the aeons in the Fullness],
though they are only their shadows.” [The Tripartite Tractate, v. 78]
It should be noted that the vice of vanity is an inversion of the
aeons’ second rule of giving glory, where the aeons were not to give glory to
themselves. Vanity is giving glory to oneself instead of to the Creator. The
purpose of “giving glory” is to remain centered on the object of adoration.
Giving glory to oneself strengthens the ego. Giving glory to the Creator
focuses attention off of ego and onto the Originating Consciousness. Giving
glory is a virtue; glorifying oneself is a vice.
“In their own eyes, however, they are great and powerful
beings, more beautiful than the names [of the aeons in the Fullness], though
they are only their shadows.” [The Tripartite Tractate, v. 78]
Finally, the fourth desire driving
human activity is love of power. Love of power is a lynchpin of agents of the
deficiency, who always seek dominion over others. This is how Russell describes
love of power:
“Love of power is closely akin to
vanity, but it is not by any means the same thing. What vanity needs for its
satisfaction is glory, and it is easy to have glory without power… Many people
prefer glory to power, but on the whole these people have less effect upon the
course of events than those who prefer power to glory… Power, like vanity, is
insatiable. Nothing short of omnipotence could satisfy it completely. And as it
is especially the vice of energetic men, the causal efficacy of love of power
is out of all proportion to its frequency. It is, indeed, by far the strongest
motive in the lives of important men.”
Russell went on to say,
“Love of power is greatly
increased by the experience of power, and this applies to petty power as well
as to that of potentates.”
So while love of power can easily
be recognized in Presidents and the CEOs of corporations, it applies equally
well to the petty tyrants and bullies found in every school, business,
bureaucratic office, and family. The vice called love of power puts oneself in
the position of God and reflects a belief that one’s self is worthy of dominion
over others. This is a common delusion of agents of the Deficiency, growing as
it does from the root of ego and presumptuous thought.
The Tripartite Tractate puts it this
way:
Those of the Imitation do not know the hierarchy of
the Fullness, nor do they have assigned roles and places there. Lacking the
ALL’s cooperative design, they exist in a state of perpetual disturbance,
driven by self-centered ambition, “exalting themselves in lust for dominion,
each one of them according to the magnitude of the name of which he was a
shadow, fantasizing that he would become greater than his fellows” [The
Tripartite Tractate, v. 79].
Russell spoke of a few more vices, including an
“intoxicating love of excitement” and novelty, which he feared had little
outlet in modern society.
“Civilized life
has grown altogether too tame, and, if it is to be stable, it must provide
harmless outlets for the impulses which our remote ancestors satisfied in
hunting…”
Russell may have heartily endorsed our videogame and
VR entertainments, which allow ordinary people to do extraordinary things,
including extreme violence with no harm to others. More than a vestige of the
hunter lifestyle, this love of excitement and novelty often plunges us into the
worst of vices—the type that start out as just a bit of harmless fun, but wind
up tethering the user to deeper and longer incursions into the strange. Aside
from ensnaring the unwary into vices such as alcoholism, drug addiction,
gambling, and anonymous sex with strangers, these indulgences for the sake of
novelty and intoxicating excitement are an enormous waste of time and energy in
the vain pursuit of a Paradise that is out of reach. They are also corrosive to
the spirit of the Second Order Powers and distract from the mission at hand,
which is to battle with vice in the Endless War with the Deficiency while
bringing love and restoration to the cosmos.
We don’t know where Russell came up with his
observations about human desire. It is interesting that Gnostic cosmology so neatly answers his
observations, for Russell was avowedly antireligious, believing that whatever
good religion engendered, it did more harm than good. The Gnostics who wrote
this cosmology would have begged to differ.